Monday, December 15, 2008

Sri Chandrasekaraswami Temple History - Part VI


Before we enter the Chandrasekaraswamy Temple, let us go through one more inscription in the temple, that would be of interest to all of us..


ஸ்வஸ்திஸ்ர் மதிரை கொண்ட கோப்பரகேசரிபன்மற்கு யாண்டு யஉ ஆவது பிரமதேயம் ஈசான மங்கலத்துப் பாரதாயன் நாராயண நக்கநேன் திருச்சென்துரைக் கற்றளி பரமேசுவரர்க்கு சந்திராதித்தவல் உண்ணாழிகையில் நொன்தா விள) க்கெரிய நான் குடுத்த நிலமாவது எங்கள் பிரமதேயம் நீர் நிலத்து அல்லூர் வாய்க்காலின் கீழை முக்கால் விளாகத்து என் காற் செய் ஊர் அறிஞ்ச பன் நான்கெல்லையில்லகப்பட்ட உண்ணியம் ஒழிவின்றி திருநொன்தா விளக்குக்கு குடுத்தேன் பாரதாயன் நாராயண நக்கனேன் நான் சாந்தியபுறமாகக் குடுத் த நிலமாவது அல்லூர் வாய்க்காலின் மிய்வாய்க்கால் கொகிள_காற் செய்யில் அரை மாவும் பள்ளத்து தென்னுலவாய் காற்செய் கூற்றில் ஒரு மாவரை.

This deals with the gift of a land to the temple for a ‘nanda vilakku” (ever burning oil lamp). The donor is a person called Narayana Nakkan, belonging to the Bharadhwaja Gothra !!

He is a resident of Isanamangalam, a brahmadeyam ( a village of tax free lands usually gifted to Brahmins reciting and teaching Vedas). The produce from this land is to be utilized for the purpose of lighting a lamp and keeping it eternally lit, as long as the Sun and Moon are there.

The inscription is dated in the twelfth regnal year of Madiraikonda Koparakesaripanmar (Parantaka I) -- the title Madiraikonda signifies the victory of Parantaka over the Pandyas of Madurai.

Since the inscription mentions ‘Tiruchenduraik karralip parameswarkku’
One can assume that even during the regime of Parantaka I this temple was a karrali (built of stone) -- Only a very detailed search will reveal, whether it was already a karrali or became a karrali in a later period. (Transcription and Reading from article of Dr. M. Lavanya in the Varalaaru magazine)

And the usage of the word ‘Nakkan” reveals that residents were in the habit of prefixing or suffixing their names – to highlight perhaps their status in the community, or to indicate their professional skills.

The word ‘Nakkan’ generally meant ‘a disciple/follower of Siva’ and Siva himself is known ‘Nakkan’ as is evident from ‘Thevaram’. Surprisingly this word does not appear in other tamil literature of the time, but only in thevaram. This word also makes one to assume that the inscription itself is from an earlier period.

Nakkan appears to be a word applicable to both genders.. Eminent scholar, Dr. Iravatham Mahadevan has written a very detailed article in the Varalaaru magazine on the word ‘nakkan’ and some excerpts from his article follow:

*** It is quite true that Siva was called ‘Nakkan” (meaning ‘nirvani’ a ‘naked person’ in Sanskrit). But the ‘Nakkan’ suffix used by people appears to be a tamil word.. If one takes the root word ‘Nahu’ (smile) and add ‘An’ to the word, it becomes Nakkan meaning ‘Nagaimugan’ or a ‘smiling person’ ; and possibly this explains why people were named ‘Nakkan’

The same word when applied to females should be taken to mean ‘sister’ In the inscriptions at Thanjavur Temple the word ‘akkan’ has been used whenever the relationship of a sister is indicated. The following table will show the evolution of the Tamil words describing a kinship in the old days;

The word ‘Anthai’ when prefixed with indicators of ‘tham’ and ‘nam’
Becomes “Thanthai and Nanthai. Similarly from the word ‘ambi”, comes
Thambi and Nami – from Angai, the words Thangai andNangai -- and also
Angachchi, Thangachchi --- from the word ‘Akkai’ – Akkal, Akkachchi,
Thamakkai, and Nakkan signifying relationship of ‘sister’

Siblings were called either as ‘Thamakkai’ or ‘Akka’ or Thangai depending on the age of the person. Similarly other ladies – not a blood relation – were called ‘Nakkan’ or ‘Nangai’ and generally they are young ladies. (Article ‘Nakkan’ by Dr. Iravatham Mahadevan in the magazine Varalaaru)

And the above inscription shows that our neighbour Allur was also in existence during that period. That there were many irrigation canals around the village to help the agriculture-oriented village e.g. Brahmadeya vaikkal, Allur Vaikkal, Ulagu vaikkal. And Thidakki vaikkal .

When lands were gifted to the temple for the benefit of the saints, or sivanadiars, they were called ‘santhipuram’ -- for purpose of festivals, it was called ‘thiruvizhappuram’ etc.

There are, mentioned in this, and other inscriptions words of land measures- veli, kani, ma, munthirigai, chinnam, paathi -- other measures, padhakku, kuruni, uzhakku, marakkal, kalam, uri, nazhi.. Most measures are still in use though some are not. These inscriptions are not only providing information about the temple, but also details of the village, its residents, the administration of the village, and the temple, and some of our neighbours too.

Would you believe that the temple at Allur was called “Nakkan Koil” ? Yes, it is true. Writing in the Vara;aaru magazine, under the title “Thirumbip paarkkirom” Dr. R. Kalaikkovan reminisces on his archaelogical adventures, and Allur appears to be the first ever temple he visited on the inscriptions hunt in 1986. He writes -- The temple at Allur belongs to the early Chola period, known as “Nakkan Thali” and was located in a mango grove, amidst shrubs. The temple has inscriptions of Parantaka I, Sundara Chola, a beautiful image of Murugan and a gandharva -- though small, the temple is a marvel in architecture; now known as the Pasupatheeswarar Koil, it has not been properly maintained and is in neglect.. (Dr. Kalaikkovan visited this temple in 1986, says the temple is neglected, and I do not know its present status -- in the forties when I visited this temple, it appeared alright)…..

Before we conclude our deliberations on the inscriptions in the Tiruchendurai temple, it appears that an inscription of 1492 A.D. of the controversial Konerirayan may perhaps be the most recent one ..

Konerirayan was a lieutenant to Thirumalairayan, a vassal of the Vijayanagar Naiks who was in control of Tiruchi and Thanjavur areas. Konerirayan took over the reins himself, after demise of
Thirumalairayan, and ruled these areas between 1486 and 1495..…

Konerirayan was alleged to be an anti-vaishnavite (there is a dispute on this issue as scholars feel he is not an anti-vaishnavite) and there was a silent revolt in Srirangam in which two Jeeyars gave up their lives by falling down from the South and Vellai gopurams of the Temple. The situation was ultimately rectified by the efforts of Kandadai Ramanujadasan who appealed to Narasanaik the Vijayanagara King at the time -- who, in response to the appeal, fought with Konerirayan, killed him in battle and restored normalcy in Srirangam . Tirunallam village in the Cholanaadu was renamed Konerirajapuram in memory of this ruler.. --- (excerpts from “Chola Mandalathu Varalaatru Naayagargalin Sirpangalum Oviyangalum” by Kudavoyil Balasubramanian –publication of Tamil Palkalaik kazhakam 1987)

It is amazing that the temple carries inscriptions from the 9th till the 15th century most of which reflect gifts of land and/or gold to the Temple..

There may be other inscriptions too and we will come back to this subject later.

(to be continued)

- Sethuraman

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Sri Chandrasekaraswami Temple History - Part V


A contribution by K. V. Soundara Rajan ---included in Encyclopaedia of Indian Temple Achitecture – South India – Lower Dravidadesa (200 b.c. – 1324 a.d.) – edited by Michael . Meister and coordinated by M. A. Dhaky ---deals with the Irukkuvel lineage of which is our popular Pudi Adichcha Pidariyar. (publication of the American Institute of Indian Studies, University of Pennsylvania Press 1983)

****
Tracing the genealogical table of the Irrukuvel chiefs of Kodumbalur and their inter – relationship with the house of Vijayalaya Cola, he says it is hard to identify the Cola House to which Cattan Maravan (the eighth chief of the Kodumbalur line) was matrimonially related. It may either have been that of the Maharaja Kumarankusa or that of the house of Vijayalaya Cola, which was then gradually gaining power in the Tanjavur area. In any case the Irrukuvels, from at least the late years of the son of Sattan or Cattan namely Maravan Pudi alias Tennavan Ilangovelar (who is styled Bhuti Vikramakesari in an undated Muvarkoil inscription) were intimately connected with the house of Vijayalaya Cola both matrimonially and by a political alliance which never broke.

By a series of complicated equations based on epigraphical data, Maravan Pudi alias Tennavan Ilangovelar alias Bhuti Vikramakesari has now been established to be a senior contemporary of Cola Aditya I; Maravan Pudi had two wives, one Varaguna and the second Nangai Karrali Pirattiyar Maravan Pudi’s sister Madevadigal was married to Kannaradeva, son of Cola Aditya I by the Rashtrakuta princess… His daughter Pudi Aditta Pidari was given in marriage to prince Arikulakesari, son of Cola Parantaka I and the grandson of Aditya I… To Maravan Pudi’s first son Sembiyan Ilangovelar alias Pudi Parantakan, Aditya I gave in marriage his sister Nangai Varaguna… Maravan Pudi’s second son was named Pudi Aditta Pidaran alias Adityavarma, perhaps in honour of the Cola Potentate Aditya I, while Pudi Parantakan the alias of his eldest son, was perhaps taken after the name of Cola Parantaka I, Aditya’s son. (And that shatters my dreamy conception that the Aditham Pudi and his son Parantakan mentioned in one of the inscriptions at the temple could perhaps be Aditya Cola himself and his son Parantaka Cola !!!)

Talking about the Tiruchendurai temple he says ** A building that still has some of the Muvarkoil look, is the Chandrasekhara Temple at Tiruchendurai. Founded by Maravan Pudi’s daughter, Pudi Aditta Pidari, sometime before the 23rd year of Rajakesarivarma (Aditya I) A.D.894, it represents one more royal foundation of the Irrukuvel House. In size it is slightly smaller than the Muvarkoil buildings.

There are two inscriptions of Pudi Aditta Pidari of the second and third years of Parakesari (Parantaka I A.D.909 and 910) in which the temple has been specifically referred to as “karrali’ (stone building) – the first inscription also revealing the fact that the temple in stone was built by her. These facts are not mentioned in the earlier inscription of the 23rd year of Rajakesarivarma (Aditya I – AD.894) recorded by the same royal donor. This has led Douglas Barrett to surmise that the royal lady had replaced the original building in brick in or before A.D.909. But a certain formal nearness of this building to the Muvarkoil, together with the style of pilaster decorations and the bhutas of the bhutamala, seem to warrant a date in or before A.D.894 when the princess made her first donation. ***

Continuing, Soundara Rajan says that in addition to the famous Muvarkoil of Kodumbalur, two other temples are related in style; the Sundareswara Temple at Tirukkattalai, and the Candrasekhara Temple at Tiruchendurai near Tiruchi, which was founded by Pudi Aditta Pidari, daughter of Maravan Pudi, alias Bhuti Vikramakesari, and grand-daughter-in-law of Cola Aditya I. It shows features characteristic both of Malanadu (Kaverinadu) and Konadu schools plus local traits of the Tiruchi territory. The buildings of sons and grandson of Bhuti Vikramakesari, are few and inconsequential.

The scholars may differ in their views, about the actual year of construction of this temple, but the fact remains that the Chandrasekaraswamy temple at Tiruchendurai is more than a millennium old. And we are glad that Pudi Aditha Pidari had placed the Tiruhendurai Temple as a center-piece for these livelier arguments and discussions of scholars and intellects.

All that we the villagers knew was that our temple is an ancient one, and has many inscriptions in it, but apart from that we had not taken any interest to find out details of the history of temple. Going through all these details now, we know that the temple and the village has an illustrious past, thanks to the Archaeological Survey of India, its epigraphists, scholars, and the Dr.Ma. Rajamanickanaar Historical Research Foundation Who have taken so much interest in unearthing the inscriptions, and transcribing them.

(to be continued)

- Sethuraman